Dylan Patel on Why AI's Biggest Infrastructure Gains Come From Co-Design
- AI Engineering, Software, And Developer Tooling
- AI Infrastructure, Compute, Chips, And Energy
- Capital, Markets, And Business Models
- Frontier Models And Capabilities
- Jobs, GDP, And Economic Growth
- Open Models

The real breakthrough innovation is when you leapfrog a few layers, you co-optimize and co-design them, and now all of a sudden you've taken what could have been a 2x here, 2x here, 2x here, and instead of being multiplicative to 8x, it's actually 100x because you've optimized across all three layers.
Recap
In the conversation, Dylan told the story of living in a tent on the back of his truck and in cheap motels while blogging, researching, and listening to semiconductor textbooks. Later, he would travel to more than 40 conferences a year. What does this have to do with co-design?
It gave Dylan a deep appreciation for the interconnected nature of the chip stack: tools, chemicals, fabs, software, and ultimately the systems view that led to the success of SemiAnalysis.
He formed one of the earliest and most robust theses on AI co-design: the idea that you cannot cleanly split progress into model, software, and hardware buckets. The big jumps come when labs co-optimize all three.
Ideas
- The big efficiency gains come from co-designing model, software, and hardware layers00:23:10-00:27:10
Patel rejects a hardware-only account of AI efficiency gains. He says model architecture, infrastructure software, kernels, and chips have all improved, and the largest jumps come when labs optimize the model, software stack, and hardware together.
- The key inference benchmark is a throughput-versus-interactivity curve00:18:20-00:22:30
Patel says inference, the serving of a trained model to users, should not be benchmarked as one generic workload. A batch document job can pack requests for lower cost, while an interactive coding or chat session may spend more compute for lower latency.
- The compute crunch persists because model usefulness grows faster than deployed compute00:50:48-00:55:00
Patel says more data center capacity is coming online every quarter, but better models create valuable new tasks faster than supply can double or quadruple. He treats this as a demand-and-supply crunch, not only a delay in hardware buildout.
- CUDA is shifting from API moat to ecosystem-shape moat00:35:08-00:36:46
Patel says Nvidia's advantage is no longer only CUDA as a programming interface. Many open models are co-designed for Nvidia GPUs, while interconnect choices such as Nvidia NVLink and Google's ICI shape which model architectures run well on which hardware.
- Specialized ASICs can win niches but risk local minima00:44:20-00:50:48
Patel expects more bifurcation between model architectures and chip architectures. Custom ASICs can be efficient for one workload, but labs may still need general-purpose AI compute because next year's model architecture is uncertain.
- Static inference benchmarks are obsolete as models and serving stacks change weekly00:14:50-00:18:20
Patel says inference benchmarking has to be living and daily because models, drivers, PyTorch, vLLM, SGLang, kernels, and chip configurations keep changing. A point-in-time benchmark can go stale before it reflects real serving economics.
- Neoclouds exist because AI cloud rewards different execution than CPU cloud01:04:00-01:10:15
Patel says AI GPU clusters reward fast buildout, specialized networking, different contracting, and higher revenue per megawatt. That gives neoclouds room where traditional hyperscaler advantages in CPU cloud do not map cleanly onto AI infrastructure.
- Cerebras is valuable for fast tokens but exposed to frontier-model size and context length00:38:46-00:42:07
Patel says fast inference has a real market when the user values speed, but SRAM-heavy systems can face limits if frontier models become very large or require long context. The chip can be strong and still be constrained by the model shape it must serve.
- Intelligence per watt has improved dramatically but remains far from biology00:22:30-00:23:10
Patel says equivalent-quality model cost has fallen roughly 60x and intelligence per watt roughly 40x, while computers remain many orders of magnitude away from the human brain. He adds that the comparison does not settle infrastructure strategy because computers can use much more power than brains.
- DeepSeek shows model shapes can fit one hardware family and perform badly on another00:24:50-00:26:20
Patel uses DeepSeek as a public example of co-design. Its expert shapes, network IO, collectives, and attention arithmetic were optimized for Hopper, Blackwell, and Huawei chips, so a strong TPU can still be a poor fit for that model shape.
Tags
- AI Infrastructure Efficiency
- AI Infrastructure
- AI Chips
- Inference Infrastructure
- Frontier Models
- Benchmarks And Evaluation
- Compute Supply Chain
- Data Centers And Energy
- AI Economics
- Cloud Economics
- Developer Tooling
- Open Source AI
- Open Weights
- AI Capital Allocation
- Private Markets
- Cloud Runtime
- Startup Infrastructure